In a contempt application, the Bench dismissed the plea for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear and the case was not being pursued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1532 of 2019
Applicant :- Ram Khelawan Opposite Party :- Keshav Prasad Tehsildar Mihipurwa Motipur Bahraich And Others Counsel for Applicant :- M.A. Siddiqui
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Case is called out.
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant.
As it is evident from the record that the case is not being pursued by the applicant, therefore, the present contempt application is liable to be dismissed and the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 10.11.2022 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by GAURAV PAL Date: 2022.11.11 10:01:00 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow or dismiss the contempt application for lack of active pursuit by the applicant.
Ram Khelawan
Keshav Prasad Tehsildar Mihipurwa Motipur Bahraich And Others
Rajeev Singh
Gaurav Pal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
