The contempt court dismissed an application by the applicant, noting that the underlying writ judgment of this Court remained complied with by the authority, and consequently discharged contempt notices.
Contempt notices discharged; Contempt Application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 526 of 2022
Applicant :- Ankita Pattanaik Opposite Party :- Suhas Lalinakere Yathiraj,D.M. Counsel for Applicant :- Pratik Chandra
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for opposite party.
It is stated that judgment of this Court dated 13.09.2021 passed in Writ-C No.21198 of 2021 has been complied with which fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the applicant.
In this respect, a compliance affidavit has been filed annexing therewith the copy of the letter sent by RERA dated 04.05.2022.
However, if the applicant is aggrieved by the order passed by the authority concerned, she may avail remedy available to her in law.
Since the order of Writ Court has been complied with, therefore, contempt notices are discharged.
The contempt application is dismissed and is consigned to record.
Order Date :- 6.5.2022 Mohit
Digitally signed by MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA Date: 2022.05.07 10:39:55 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ankita Pattanaik
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
