Court granted relief in a contempt application after the applicant affirmed compliance with a previous PIL judgment via an authority's order.
Contempt notices were discharged and the application was dismissed and consigned to the record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 132 of 2022
Applicant :- Ravi Prakash Yadav Opposite Party :- Sri Vinay Pande, Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Standing Counsel.
It is stated that judgment of this Court dated 03.08.2021 passed in PIL No.958 of 2021 has been complied with which fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the applicant.
In this respect, a compliance affidavit has been filed annexing therewith the order dated 01.04.2022 passed by opposite party deciding the claim of the applicant.
However, if the applicant is aggrieved by the order passed by the authority concerned, he may avail remedy available to him in law.
Since the order of Writ Court has been complied with, therefore, contempt notices are discharged.
The contempt application is dismissed and is consigned to record.
Order Date :- 5.5.2022 Mohit
Digitally signed by MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA Date: 2022.05.07 10:14:23 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ravi Prakash Yadav
Sri Vinay Pande
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
