Allowed

Azuruddin @ Ajju and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC12 Jul 2022BAIL/21460/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the applicants in a case registered under the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986. The release is contingent upon them furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties, and adhering to strict conditions regarding their presence during trial and conduct.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with personal bond and two local sureties, subject to specific conditions regarding conduct and appearance during trial.

Azuruddin @ Ajju and Another Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21460 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Azuruddin @ Ajju And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mustaqeem Ahmad,Mohd Imran Khan

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶7

The present bail application has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to enlarge them on bail in Case Crime No.117 of 2022, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, P.S. Farah, District Mathura.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that as per gang chart one case has been shown against the applicants in which they have been granted bail which has been explained in para 8 of the affidavit filed in support of bail application. He further submits that apart from the case mentioned in the gang chart, no other case is registered against the applicants. There is no possibility of the applicants of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicants are enlarged on bail, the applicants shall not misuse the liberty of bail. It is next contended that the applicants are languishing in jail since 20.04.2022.

¶9

Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the bail prayer of the applicants but could not dispute the factual aspects.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, enlargement of accused on bail in the case mentioned in the gang chart, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the applicants are entitled for bail, let the applicants- Azuruddin @ Ajju and Azmat @ Azmal involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions :-

¶11

(i) The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that they will not tamper with the evidence and will not

¶12

pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and will cooperate with the trial. The applicants shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶13

(ii) The applicants shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iii) In case, the applicants misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure their presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against them, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

(iv) The applicants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicants are deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against them in accordance with law.

¶16

Order Date :- 12.7.2022 Jitendra

¶17

Digitally signed by JITENDRA KUMAR PATEL Date: 2022.07.15 13:19:58 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Azuruddin @ Ajju and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Azuruddin @ Ajju and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parvej @ Changul @ Bhura Vs at Lucknstate of U.P. through Secretary Home

Manoj Kannaujiya Vs State of U.P.

Surendra Singh Vs State of U.P.

Taslim Vs State of U.P.

Dharmendra Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P.

Praveen Pratap Singh @ Kanha Vs State of U.P.