Application for anticipatory bail dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the applicant despite a previous occasion to appear. Any interim bail order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6846 of 2021
Applicant :- Praveen Joy Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Gautam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None has appeared on behalf of applicant. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
On previous date also, no-one has appeared on behalf of applicant. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing the instant application.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.8.2022 Neeraj
Digitally signed by NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.08.23 17:33:02 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Praveen Joy
State of U.P.
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
