Single judge dismissed an anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the police had submitted a final report.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2008 of 2022
Applicant :- Akhanad Pratap Upadhyay And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Kumar Upadhyaya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sandeep Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for State are present.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that instant application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous, as the police have submitted final report, hence, the instant application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 23.8.2022 Neeraj
Digitally signed by NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.08.23 18:03:44 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Akhanad Pratap Upadhyay
Neeraj Kumar Singh, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
