Anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of prosecution due to failure of the applicant to appear in court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6038 of 2022
Applicant :- Nadeem Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None for the applicant despite taking the case in revised list.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Perusal of ordersheet shows that on previous date also, no one has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the present application. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing the present application.
The instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 22.8.2022 Anand
Digitally signed by ANAND VERMA Date: 2022.08.22 17:32:21 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Beer Singh,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
