The Allahabad High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear before the court on the instant hearing despite being listed and previously adjourned, with the interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1814 of 2021
Applicant :- Satish Shanker Shukla Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sugendra Kumar Yadav,Anand Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None has appeared on behalf of applicant, despite taking the case in revised list. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
On previous date also, no-one has appeared on behalf of applicant. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing the instant application.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.8.2022 Neeraj
Digitally signed by NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.08.23 18:02:37 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Satish Shanker Shukla
Raj Beer Singh
Neeraj Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
