Mohd. Danish v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite notice and listing.
What the court decided
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6233 of 2022
Applicant :- Mohd. Danish Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None has appeared on behalf of the applicant despite taking the case in revised list.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Perusal of ordersheet shows that on previous date also, no one has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the present application. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing the present application.
The instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 23.11.2022
Anand
Digitally signed by ANAND VERMA Date: 2022.11.24 14:26:02 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mohd. Danish
Coram
Raj Beer Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/6233/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court