Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 15398 of 2021
Applicant :- Purnima Keshari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vinayak Varma,Bipin Lal Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Siddharth Singh
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None has appeared on behalf of applicant, despite taking the case in revised list.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
It appears from record that on previous date also, no-one has appeared on behalf of applicant.
It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing the instant application.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 23.11.2022 Neeraj
Digitally signed by NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.11.23 15:40:30 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Purnima Keshari
State Of U.P.
Neeraj Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
