Anticipatory bail application (Criminal Misc. No. 491 of 2022) was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant was absent and the application had become infructuous. Idle if any stood vacated.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 491 of 2022
Applicant :- Mohd. Alam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shivakant Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
None is present on behalf of the applicant(s) to press the application even in the revised call. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
As such, with the efflux of time, the anticipatory bail application seems to have become infructuous.
The same is dismissed for want of prosecution and being infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 19.10.2022 Siddhant
Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SAHU Date: 2022.10.19 15:10:18 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Alam
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
