Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and to victimize him. Learned counsel has stated that applicant is not named in the FIR. The co-accused person, who is named in the FIR has been enlarged on regular bail. The applicant has nothing to do with the said offence. The name of the applicant has come up in the statement of the arrested co-accused person, which is not admissible in law. There is no identification parade made of any of the accused persons. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The charge sheet has been filed. The applicant has cooperated in the investigation. It is further stated that applicant is co-operating in the trial and is ready to do so in future also. There is no likelihood of the applicant repeating the said offence, if any. Several other submissions have been made on behalf of the applicant to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against him. The circumstances which, as per counsel, led to the false implication of the applicant have also been touched upon at length.
