Disposed

Yogendra v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC19 Oct 2022ABAIL/10172/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Upon the applicant's counsel requesting dismissal of the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail, and the State not objecting, the court granted relief pending surrender. The applicant was directed to surrender before the trial court within six weeks, after which a regular bail application would be decided per Supreme Court guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Applicant directed to surrender before concerned court within six weeks; no coercive action during this period; liberty to file regular bail application.

Yogendra Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10172 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Yogendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shailja Kant Tripathi,Shrey Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Shrey Singh, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the first informant and Smt. Ladli Pandey, learned A.G.A. for State .

¶6

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No. 0290 of 2022, under sections 323, 325, 307, 342, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Garhmukteshwar, district Hapur.

¶7

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within six weeks from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶10

For the period of six weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant- Yogendra , in the above case.

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 19.10.2022 Shalini

¶13

Digitally signed by SHALINI JAISWAL Date: 2022.10.20 10:20:20 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Yogendra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogendra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Maurya and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Madhuri Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Hansnath Vs State of U.P.

Hameed Khan Vs State of U.P.

Swadesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd. Alam Vs State of U.P.