Disposed

Sunil Maurya and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC13 Oct 2022ABAIL/6028/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application whereby the applicants' counsel withdrew the bail application as a regular bail application pending surrender within one month, guided by Apex Court guidelines. The court directed no coercive action during this period.

What did the court decide?

The applicants were directed to surrender within one month; for that period, no coercive action was to be taken. Liberty to file a regular bail application was granted.

Sunil Maurya and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6028 of 2022 Applicant :- Sunil Maurya And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Neelabh Srivastava,Sumit Kumar

¶2

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶3

Heard Sri Abhishek Tiwari, learned counsel for applicants and Sri Neelabh Srivastava, learned counsel for the informant as well as Sri Vibhav Anand Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶4

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.0218 of 2022, under Sections 323, 327, 308, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali, District Azamgarh.

¶5

After arguing for some time, applicants' counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶6

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicants.

¶7

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶8

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants- Sunil Maurya and Anil Maurya, in the above case.

¶9

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of .

¶10

Order Date :- 13.10.2022 Ravi Kant

¶11

Digitally signed by RAVI KANT Date: 2022.10.14 13:43:10 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sunil Maurya and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Maurya and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arshad Khan Vs State of U.P.

Ashish Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ragib Rana Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Madhuri Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Hansnath Vs State of U.P.

Anuj Chauhan Vs State of U.P. and Another