The High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed by Chaman @ Bhoora for want of prosecution as the applicant had not appeared on the current or previous hearing dates.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed for lack of appearance; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4702 of 2020
Applicant :- Chaman @ Bhoora @ Chaman Prakash Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Bhaskar Bhadra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None has appeared on behalf of applicant. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
On previous date also, no-one has appeared on behalf of applicant. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing the instant application.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 6.8.2022 Ashish/Neeraj
Digitally signed by NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.08.08 16:42:20 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application be disposed of for want of prosecution.
Whether an interim bail order, if any, remains in force following the dismissal of the main application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chaman @ Bhoora @ Chaman Prakash
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
