The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed an application for anticipatory bail for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1438 of 2021
Applicant :- Gokalesh Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mrityunjay Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None for the applicant despite taking the case in revised list.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
On previous dates also no one has appeared on behalf of applicant to press the instant application for anticipatory bail. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing the matter.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 6.8.2022 A. Tripathi
Digitally signed by AKHILESH TRIPATHI Date: 2022.08.06 17:41:16 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Gokalesh Sharma
State Of U.P.
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
