This is a single-paragraph order where the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous upon the advice of learned counsel without detailed reasoning. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
Application dismissed as infructuous. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11825 of 2022
Applicant :- Dilshad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sameer Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sandeep Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Sri Sameer Khan, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that the present application has now become infructuous and may be dismissed as such.
Sri Sandeep Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the first informant, has no objection to the submissions made by learned counsel for applicant.
In view of the statement so made, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 25.11.2022 Shalini
Digitally signed by SHALINI JAISWAL Date: 2022.11.26 14:58:03 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Dilshad
State of U.P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
