Disposed

Ramchandra v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC24 Nov 2022ABAIL/9660/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application where the applicant requested withdrawal. The court directed surrender within one month for a regular bail application to be decided under Satender Kumar Antil guidelines, granting no coercive action during that period.

What did the court decide?

Order directed applicant to surrender within one month for regular bail consideration; no coercive action for one month or until surrender.

Ramchandra Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9660 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Ramchandra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pushpendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Wahid Zamal, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pushpendra Singh, learned counsel for applicant as well as Smt. Ladli Pandey, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶6

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.0333 of 2017, under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323 and 504 I.P.C., P.S. Siana, District Bulandshahr.

¶7

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶10

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of .

¶12

Order Date :- 24.11.2022 Ravi Kant

¶13

Digitally signed by RAVI KANT Date: 2022.11.24 16:35:02 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ramchandra v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramchandra v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nand Lal Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Rashmi Rawat (Advocate) Vs State of U.P.

Mohit @ Anuj and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Gulfam Vs State of U.P.

Rajni Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sumit Shakya Vs State of U.P. and Another