Disposed

Pushpa Devi and 2 Others v. State of U.P.. and Another

Allahabad HC24 Nov 2022ABAIL/9123/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application by accepting the counsel's prayer to dismiss it with liberty to file a regular bail application. Applicants were directed to surrender within one month, and coercive action was stayed for the interim period.

What did the court decide?

Directing surrender within one month; stay on coercive action for one month or until surrender; liberty to file regular bail.

Pushpa Devi and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9123 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Pushpa Devi And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vishal Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Vishal Jaiswal, learned counsel for applicants as well as Sri Vibhav Anand Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶6

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.138 of 2020, under Section 306 I.P.C., P.S. Nevadhiya, District Jaunpur.

¶7

After arguing for some time, applicants' counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicants.

¶9

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶10

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants- Pushpa Devi, Upasana Devi and Ranjana Devi, in the above case.

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of .

¶12

Order Date :- 24.11.2022 Ravi Kant

¶13

Digitally signed by RAVI KANT Date: 2022.11.24 16:35:08 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pushpa Devi and 2 Others v. State of U.P.. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pushpa Devi and 2 Others v. State of U.P.. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nand Lal Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Rashmi Rawat (Advocate) Vs State of U.P.

Mohit @ Anuj and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Gulfam Vs State of U.P.

Rajni Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sumit Shakya Vs State of U.P. and Another