Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and to victimize her. Admittedly, the matter is of family discord. An FIR was lodged by the applicant, who happens to be the wife of the first informant at Case Crime No. 11 of 2011 and the final report has been submitted in it on 6.5.2011 under Sections 498A IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act against the applicant. The present FIR is a counterblast to the said final report submitted against him and after investigation, the police had filed a closure report in the subject matter on 5.1.2015 and again the same closure report dated 23.5.2017 was reiterated. On the protest petition filed by the first informant, the applicant had been summoned vide order dated 31.1.2022. The present case is a counterblast case and has been just foisted on the applicant to force her to compromise in the matters pending against the first informant and his family members. The applicant is the wife of the first informant and civil litigations are pending between the parties. There is no criminal history of the applicant. It is further stated that applicant is co-operating in the investigation and is ready to cooperate in future also. There is no likelihood of the applicant repeating the said offence, if any. Several other submissions have been made on behalf of the applicant to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against her. The circumstances which, as per counsel, led to the false implication of the applicant have also been touched upon at length.
