The single judge refused the application to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 323, 504, and 506 IPC, finding no abuse of process. The court permitted the applicants to move for discharge within a month and stayed coercive measures for four months.
Stayed coercive measures against applicants for four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9879 of 2022 Applicant :- Jamal Ahamad And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mahendra Pratap Singh,Sandip Kumar Sinha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash Tripathi,J.
Order Date :- 16.7.2022 Priya
Digitally signed by PRIYA KUSHWAHA Date: 2022.07.16 13:52:54 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned proceedings under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC should be quashed.
Whether the charge sheet discloses an offence against the applicants.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jamal Ahamad
Om Prakash Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
