It is submitted that in this case a cheque was given by the applicant to the complainant amounting to Rs.40,000/- which was returned by the bank unpaid on receiving the instruction of the applicant himself to stop the payment because the fact of fraud committed by the complainant came into his knowledge after execution of sale deed between applicant and complainant. It is further submitted that complaint was filed against the applicant in which he was summoned and appeared before the court concerned and was also granted bail. Thereafter, moved the application before the court concerned in this regard to discharge him which was rejected by the court concerned holding that evidence on behalf of both the parties have to come on record, therefore, that application was not maintainable at that very stage. Thereafter, revision was also filed before the learned Sessions Judge which was also rejected on 11.10.2021. Therefore, requests to quash the order dated 11.10.2021 passed by learned Sessions Judge and also the order dated 27.09.2021 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate (J.D.).