Single judge dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as withdrawn, granting liberty to the applicant to file a Section 216 Cr.P.C. application at the appropriate stage, citing a Supreme Court judgment.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach Court concerned for prayer at the stage of framing of charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 20816 of 2022
Applicant :- Pushpendra Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 19.10.2022/AK (Sl. No. 5 out of 394 fresh cases)
Digitally signed by AWADESH KUMAR Date: 2022.10.19 16:49:18 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application under Section 216 Cr.P.C. considering a prayer to alter the charge can be considered at the stage prior to framing of charge.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ghulam Hassan Beigh vs. Mahammad Maqbool Magrey and othersReferred¶5
2022 SCC OnLine SC 914 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pushpendra Singh
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
