The High Court dismissed the criminal revision filed by Jai Prakash. The judge perused the record in the absence of appearance and found no manifest error or illegality to justify interference with the lower court's order summoning the accused.
The criminal revision is dismissed and any interim order is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 263 of 2010
Revisionist :- Jai Prakash And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Vikrant Rana Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Manoj Mishra
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 18.10.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.10.19 17:31:19 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order summoning the revisionists under sections 435 and 506 IPC warrants interference in criminal revision under sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jai Prakash And Others
State of U.P. and Another
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
