This court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging an order allowing a maintenance application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The court held there was no illegality as the petitioners failed to produce evidence refuting the lower court's finding of the respondent's income.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 621 of 2019
Revisionist :- Khushi @ Parul (Minor) And Anr. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Revisionist :- Anil Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 18.10.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.10.20 18:30:14 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the lower court's finding that the opposite party earned Rs. 4,000/- was perverse or arbitrary.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Khushi @ Parul
Anr.
State Of U.P.
Anr.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
