This petition under Article 227 was heard in absence of petitioner counsel. The judge reviewed records and found no illegality in the impugned orders, leading to dismissal of the petition.
Petition dismissed; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 905 of 2008
Petitioner :- Sukai And Another Respondent :- Narayan And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hemant Kumar Dubey
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Case has been called out in revised. Learned counsel for the petitioners is not present.
However, matter is pertaining to the year 2008, therefore, I have gone through the records. I found no illegality in the impugned orders.
Accordingly, petition lacks merit and is dismissed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 16.2.2022 Arvind
Digitally signed by ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA Date: 2022.02.16 17:17:42 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned orders contained any illegality warranting interference under Article 227 of the Constitution.
Sukai And Another
Narayan And Others
Arvind Kumar Gupta J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
