Disposed

Khoob Chandra Paliwal Shiksha Samiti Primary School v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC15 Feb 2022WRIC/2564/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction to decide an application for school recognition filed on 31.8.2019. The court disposed of the matter by directing the respondent to decide the application within six weeks, explicitly stating it did not adjudicate the case on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 3 to decide the petitioner's application dated 31.8.2019 within six weeks.

Khoob Chandra Paliwal Shiksha Samiti Primary… — Education and Admissions | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 4

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2564 of 2022

¶3

Petitioner :- Khoob Chandra Paliwal Shiksha Samiti Primary School Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shravan Kumar Panday

¶4

Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Shravan Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3.

¶6

Present petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

¶7

"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the respondent no. 3 to take appropriate decision on the application of the petitioner school for recognition dated 31.8.2019 immediately in accordance with law."

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for redressal of his grievance, he has filed application on 31.8.2019 before the respondent no.3, but till date no decision has been taken upon that. He next submitted that a suitable direction may be issued to respondent no. 3 to decide the aforesaid application of the petitioner at the earliest.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel submitted that his application shall be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law within stipulated period.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 3 to decide the aforesaid application of the petitioner dated 31.8.2019 strictly in accordance with law maximum within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶11

It is made clear that Court has not adjudicated the case on merits and it is upon the respondent no. 3 to decide the aforesaid application of the petitioner after considering the relevant Acts, Rules, Government Orders, Judicial pronouncement made by the Court as well as facts of the case.

¶12

Order Date :- 15.2.2022 Junaid

¶13

Digitally signed by JUNAID AHMAD Date: 2022.02.15 16:59:02 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Khoob Chandra Paliwal Shiksha Samiti Primary School v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khoob Chandra Paliwal Shiksha Samiti Primary School v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Waqf Sheikh Imami Vs Anwarul Haq

Ankush Mishra Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Stalin Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others

Amber Shabi Vs Aligarh Muslim University and Another

Shakumbari Ayurvedic Prikshan Sansthan Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Raghvendra Pandey Vs State of U.P. and Another