This habeas corpus petition was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel stated before the court that the writ petition had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 237 of 2022
Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Singh Rathore Thru. His Next Friend Sri Ram Sunder Chaurasiya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another
Counsel for Petitioner :- R.N. Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Saroj Yadav,J.
Heard Mr. R.N. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ganesh Gupta, learned brief holder for the Staterespondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at the Bar that the present writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed has having become infructous.
(Mrs. Saroj Yadav, J.) (Ramesh Saroj Yadav, J.)
Order Date :- 16.12.2022 A.K. Singh
Digitally signed by ASHISH KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.12.16 16:42:07 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Rakesh Kumar Singh Rathore
State of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha, J
Saroj Yadav, J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
