Disposed

Smt. Madhu v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Allahabad HC8 Jan 2021WRIC/59/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Writ Court disposed of the petition on consent without expressing an opinion on merits. The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh application with the Senior Superintendent of Police within ten days, upon which the SSP is directed to pass appropriate security orders within one month.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file a fresh application with Senior Superintendent of Police within ten days for security orders.

Smt. Madhu Vs State of U.P. and 7… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 21

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 59 of 2021

¶3

Petitioner :- Smt. Madhu Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bablu Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

¶6

By means of present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction commanding the respondent authorities to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from the private respondents 4 to 8 and direct the respondent not to interfere in the peaceful life and living of the petitioner with her sweet will.

¶7

Learned Standing Counsel very fairly submits that in case petitioner approaches the competent authority definitely his grievance would be redressed at the earliest.

¶8

In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, on consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction that in case petitioner moves a fresh application ventilating all her grievances before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ghaziabad (respondent no.2) within ten days period from today, this Court hopes and trust that the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ghaziabad would proceed in the matter and pass appropriate orders for security of the petitioner and her family members within a period of one month.

¶9

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by the petitioner alongwith a self attested identity proof of the said person (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number to which the said Aadhar Card is linked.

¶10

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶11

Order Date :- 8.1.2021 Neeraj

Smt. Madhu v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Madhu v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Birendra Singh Vs State of U.P. through Its Special Secretary(Excise) Government of U.P. and 3 Others

M/S Jay Steels Vs Union of India and 4 Others

Arvind Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sita Ram Singh and Another Vs State of U P and 7 Others

Munshi Singh Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Manoj Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others