This order dismissed an unopposed writ petition after learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the F.I.R. was registered, noting no relief could be granted under the writ jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4344 of 2021
Petitioner :- Smt. Vandana And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Kant Vishwakarma,Arvind Kumar Mishra,Ashwani Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 9.8.2021 SK Goswami
Smt. Vandana And Another
State Of U.P.
Other Respondents
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
