Disposed

Dhruv Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC11 Jan 2021WRIC/26949/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, Allahabad disposed of the writ petition seeking protection from threats, disposing it on consent by directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation within two weeks and the authority to decide it within two months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file a fresh representation within two weeks; authority directed to examine and remedy grievances within two months thereafter.

Dhruv Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Court No. - 21

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26949 of 2020

¶3

Petitioner :- Dhruv Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Murari Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondent.

¶6

Petitioner is before this Court with a request commanding the respondent authorities to protect the life and personal liberty of the petitioner from continuous threats given by the anti-elements of the society in the interest of justice.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has already moved a detailed representation dated 14.9.2020 to the respondent no. 4, which is pending consideration.

¶8

Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel very fairly that in case any such representation is still pending and has not been disposed of, the same will be considered and decided expeditiously.

¶9

In view of the above, on consent and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of finally asking the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the competent authority ventilating his grievances within two weeks from today and in case any such representation is being preferred definitely the same would be looked into, examined and remedied strictly in accordance with law within two months thereafter.

¶10

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by the petitioner alongwith a self attested identity proof of the said person (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number to which the said Aadhar Card is linked.

¶11

The concerned Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerised copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶12

Order Date :- 11.1.2021 A.K.Srivastava

Dhruv Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhruv Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sita Ram Singh and Another Vs State of U P and 7 Others

Smt. Madhu Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others

Munshi Singh Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Junaid Ahmad Vs Union of India and 4 Others

Ramveer Singh Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Shiv Narayan Tiwari Vs State of U.P. and 14 Others