Disposed

Ram Bachan v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC6 Jan 2021WRIC/26722/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking directions to the local authority to sanction a map and decide a representation within two months. The court asked the authority to look into the grievance and pass an order expeditiously without expressing any opinion on merits, due to respondent consent.

What did the court decide?

Directed the competent authority to look into the petitioner's grievance and pass appropriate order expeditiously, preferably within two months.

Ram Bachan Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Land Acquisition | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 21

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26722 of 2020

¶3

Petitioner :- Ram Bachan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.

¶5

Heard Shri Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the StateRespondents.

¶6

The present petition has been preferred by the petitioners for the following relief:-

¶7

"A. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent no.4 to sanction the map of the petitioner within stipulated period.

¶8

B. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent no.4 to decide the representation dated 22.5.2018 within the stipulated period"

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that for redressal of his grievance the petitioner has already represented to the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat Ghughali, Maharajganj, respondent no.4 through a letter dated 22.5.2018 and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously.

¶10

The aforesaid prayer has not been objected by learned counsel for the respondents.

¶11

In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and with the consent, the writ petition is disposed of asking the competent authority to look into the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this order, but certainly after according opportunity of hearing to all the stake holders in the matter.

¶12

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by the petitioners alongwith a self attested identity proof of the said person (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning

¶13

the mobile number to which the said Aadhar Card is linked.

¶14

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶15

Order Date :- 6.1.2021 T. Sinha

Ram Bachan v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Bachan v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sham-E-Husaini Institute of Nursing College, Hospital and Trauma Centre and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

M/S Abound Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

M/S Sagar Brick Field Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Muzibul Hasan Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Virendra Pathak Vs Purvanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited and Another

Aisha Bibi Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others