The High Court dismissed a writ petition but directed the Tehsildar to decide a pending mutation case within three months without delay, noting that keeping the petition pending served no useful purpose.
Direction to respondent-2 to decide the mutation case within three months from date of filing certified copy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25667 of 2021
Petitioner :- Kaushari Begum Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mithilesh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
a direction to, respondent-2, Tehsildar (Judicial), Zamania, District- Ghazipur to decide afore-mentioned mutation case, with all expedition without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy/computer generated copy of this order, which shall be filed by petitioner in above mentioned mutation case by means of a Notary Affidavit.
Order Date :- 1.11.2021 Saif
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this court may direct the Tehsildar to decide a pending mutation case under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 within a fixed time period despite more than 5 years of delay.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Kaushari Begum
State Of U.P.
Teesildar (Judicial), Zamania
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
