Sonbarsa v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Court directed lower court to decide the pending mutation case expeditiously within four months from the date of the order.
Court directed lower court to decide the pending mutation case expeditiously within four months from the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23995 of 2020
Petitioner :- Sonbarsa Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kripa Shankar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
The sole prayer of the petitioner is that the mutation case being Case No.242/2019 (Computerized No.T201915060600242) (Sonbarsa vs. Atwari & Anr.) under section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending in the Court of Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Budhanpur, District Azamgarh may be decided expeditiously.
Learned Standing Counsel states that all endeavour shall be made to decide the aforesaid case.
It is, therefore, directed that the Case No.242/2019 (Computerized No.T-201915060600242) (Sonbarsa vs. Atwari & Anr.) be decided within a period of four months from the date of presentation of a copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. The copy of this order shall be duly certified by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 6.1.2021 GS
(Siddhartha Varma, J.)
Sonbarsa
State Of U.P.
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court