This adjournment order records that proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, for removal of encroachments have been initiated, rendering the writ petition infructuous.
The writ petition was disposed of as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1335 of 2020
Petitioner :- Imtiyaj Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rama Shanker Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
Instructions were filed today by the learned Standing Counsel and it may be kept on record.
It has been stated that the proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for removal of the encroachments have been initiated.
Under such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the instant petition pending.
The writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 5.1.2021 Siddhant
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Imtiyaj
State Of U.P.
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
