The Writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner appeared in person but did not attend on the appointed date despite the revised cause list. No substantive adjudication was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21719 of 2021
Petitioner :- Amit Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- In Person Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
Though the cases shown in the fresh cause list have been revised, but the petitioner in person is not present.
Writ petition, accordingly, is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 13.12.2021 Anil
AMIT PRATAP SINGH
STATE OF U.P.
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA
VIKRAM D CHAUHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
