The petitioner sought speedy disposal of a mutation case pending under section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The High Court directed the authorities to decide the case within four months and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Direction to decide Case No.06105/2018 within four months; Disposal of writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19667 of 2020
Petitioner :- Ram Nain Respondent :- State Of U.P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dheeraj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
The sole prayer of the petitioner is that the mutation case being Case No.06105/2018 (Computerized No.T201814360105105 (Ram Nayan vs. Abhai Raj) under section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending in the Court of Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Shahganj, District Jaunpur may be decided expeditiously.
Learned Standing Counsel states that all endeavour shall be made to decide the aforesaid case.
It is, therefore, directed that the Case No.06105/2018 (Computerized No.T-201814360105105 (Ram Nayan vs. Abhai Raj) be decided within a period of four months from the date of presentation of a copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. The copy of this order shall be duly certified by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 11.1.2021 GS
(Siddhartha Varma, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mutation case pending under section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 should be decided expeditiously.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Nain
State Of U.P
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
