Petitioners raised grievances regarding mutation in revenue records. The Court directed them to file an appropriate application for mutation before the competent authority and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Direction to file application for mutation before competent authority with a decision in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21710 of 2020
Petitioner :- Indrawati And 39 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mainuddin Ahamad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition relates to mutation in the revenue records.
It does not appear from the records that the petitioners have filed any application for mutation before the competent authority. It has been stated by the petitioners that the village is under consolidation operations.
The petitioners may file appropriate application before the competent authority for mutation which shall be decided, in accordance with law.
With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 8.1.2021 Siddhant
Indrawati And 39 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
