The High Court dismissed a writ petition concerning railway employment on the preliminary ground that the dispute belongs to the exclusive cognizance of the Central Administrative Tribunal.
The writ petition is dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction as the matter is cognizable by the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 934 of 2021
Petitioner :- Gaurav Chahar Respondent :- Union Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yashpal Yadav,Sunil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Rajnish Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
A preliminary objection has been raised by the learned counsel for the respondent regarding maintainability of the writ petition. The dispute raised herein is pertaining to an employment of Railways.
The matter is cognizable by a competent Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal.
The writ petition is dismissed , accordingly.
Order Date :- 4.2.2021 Himanshu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition regarding railway employment disputes when the matter is cognizable by the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Gaurav Chahar
Union Of India
2 Others
Sunita Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
