The High Court disposed of this writ petition by directing the Deputy Director Horticulture to consider the petitioner's case for minimum wages within 60 days, based on specific Supreme Court precedents, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Direction to respondent no.3 to consider petitioner's representation for minimum wages within 60 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7067 of 2018
Petitioner :- Lata Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Singh,Om Prakash Ojha,Rabindra Nath Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 7.10.2021 Ashutosh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to minimum wages as a regularized sweeper based on Supreme Court precedents.
Whether a direction should be issued to the Deputy Director Horticulture to consider the petitioner's representation.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti LalReferred¶5
State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal; (2006) 9 SCC 337 · Who else cites this
State of Punjab and others Vs. Jagjit Singh and othersReferred¶5
State of Punjab and others Vs. Jagjit Singh and others; (2017) 1 SCC 148 · Who else cites this
Lata Devi
State Of U.P.
Other Respondents
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
