Disposed

Brahma Shankar Yadav v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC26 Jul 2021WRIA/5078/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Disposal of a writ petition regarding non-approval of Class-IV employee documents. The court permitted the petitioner to file a fresh representation and directed the respondent authority to decide within two months without adjudicating merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to make a fresh representation; respondent directed to decide within two months.

Brahma Shankar Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 5

¶2

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5078 of 2021

¶3

Petitioner :- Brahma Shankar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gopal Ji Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.

¶5

Order on Order Sheet.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the issue involved in the present writ petition is not similar to the issue involved in Writ-A No.5032 of 2021.

¶7

In this view of the matter, the present writ petition is taken up for admission.

¶8

Order on Writ Petition.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State.

¶10

Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner claiming that he has been appointed as Class-IV employee in Sampurnanand Inter College, Ratsar Ballia and his documents are duly forwarded by the committee of management to the D.I.O.S. Ballia for approval, however no decision is taken in the matter till date.

¶11

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶12

Learned standing counsel has no objection to the same.

¶13

In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.3-District Inspector of Schools, Ballia raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a computer generated/certified copy of this order.

¶14

In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months

¶15

from the date a computer generated/certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him.

¶16

It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law.

¶17

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of

¶18

Order Date :- 26.7.2021 Sattyarth

Brahma Shankar Yadav v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brahma Shankar Yadav v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashish Pal Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Rajendra Kumar Sengar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Yagyadutt Sharma Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sarvashakti Singh Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Bachchi Lal Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Satyaveer Shah and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others