Sandeep Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition seeking reinstatement was dismissed as infructuous after the petitioner was reinstated and the suspension order was revoked during its pendency.
This writ petition seeking reinstatement was dismissed as infructuous after the petitioner was reinstated and the suspension order was revoked during its pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3619 of 2021
Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sujeet Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Nikhil Kumar
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
At the outset, Shri Sujeet Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner states that during pendency of the petition, suspension order has been revoked and the petitioner reinstated.
In view of such statement, no cause of action survives and the petition has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 22.7.2021 Prakhar
Sandeep Kumar
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court