Habeas corpus petition challenging detention status was dismissed upon withdrawal by counsel with liberty to file a fresh petition after verifying facts.
Withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after verifying the facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 712 of 2020
Petitioner :- Smt. Pooja And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhiresh Kumar, Shailesh Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Pleadings in the writ petition indicate that the petitioner no.1 is presently in Nariniketan.
Learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents has submitted that in the event the petitioner is in Nariniketan pursuant to some judicial order, the present petition would not be cognizable by this Bench.
Sri Shailesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after verifying the facts.
The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed with liberty as prayed for.
Order Date :- 4.1.2021 Shahroz
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.)
Smt. Pooja And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
