Reeta Gautam v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8912 of 2020
Petitioner :- Reeta Gautam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devesh Kumar Shukla,Avnish Kumar Srivastava,Dharmesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Anoop Trivedi (Senior Adv.),Shekhar Gangal
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Learned counsel for the complainant states that in the present matter charge-sheet has already been submitted and against the same the petitioner has also preferred an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as such, the writ petition itself rendered infructuous.
Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous in terms of the aforesaid.
Order Date :- 10.12.2021
pks
Reeta Gautam
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court