The Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press their case.
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9377 of 2021
Petitioner :- Anil Upadhyay And 7 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rabindra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ram Bahadur Singh
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
The matter was taken up on 02.12.2021. On the said date, the Court has proceeded to pass following order:-
"List revised.
No one appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition. Sri Ram Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for the complainant is present.
List this matter again as fresh on 09.12.2021 as fresh."
List revised. No one appears on behalf of petitioners to press the present writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 9.12.2021 A. Pandey
Anil Upadhyay And 7 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
