Jitendra and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel failed to appear on the listed hearing dates without valid cause.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel failed to appear on the listed hearing dates without valid cause.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8103 of 2020
Petitioner :- Jitendra And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
List revised. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
Even on the three earlier occasions on 28.08.2020, 28.09.2020 and 13.10.2020, the petitioner's counsel was not present even in the revised call.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 10.12.2021 pks
Jitendra And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court