The petitioner withdrew the criminal miscellaneous writ petition. The High Court dismissed the filed writ petition as withdrawn and discharged any interim order that may have been passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5558 of 2021
Petitioner :- Dr. Anil Raj Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anupam Kumar,Ashutosh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
At the outset, Sri Manish Kumar holding brief of Sri Ashutosh Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner herein does not want to press the present petition.
In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn .
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 7.9.2021 P Kesari
Dr. Anil Raj
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
Sadhna Rani (Thakur)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
