The Court, finding that a charge sheet had been submitted by the police, held that the Criminal Misc. Writ Petition had become infructuous and dismissed the same.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 679 of 2020
Petitioner :- Brijlal And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nar Singh Narayan Verma,Manvendra Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Bhagwati Prasad Dwivedi
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
Sri Aman Srivastava holding brief of Sri Nar Singh Narayan Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that the charge sheet has been submitted by the concerned police, therefore, the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 6.9.2021 gp
Brijlal And 4 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Sunita Agarwal
Sadhna Rani (Thakur)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
