The appeal was dismissed as infructuous because the appellant, for whom counsel for the State had submitted that she was passed away, had been dead for a long time without any substitution application being filed.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous due to non-filing of substitution application for deceased appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- CONTEMPT APPEAL No. - 2424 of 1981
Appellant :- Km. Madhu Jain Respondent :- Kunwar Suraj Autar And Another Counsel for Appellant :- S.C. Varma
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J. Hon'ble Ajai Tyagi,J.
Case called out.
None is present on behalf of appellant.
This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 19.01.1979. Learned counsel for the State submits that appellant is passed away and there is no substitution application filed since long time. Hence, the appeal has become infructuous.
The appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 2.11.2021 P.S.Parihar
Km. Madhu Jain
Kunwar Suraj Autar And Another
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
Ajai Tyagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
