Disposed

The C/M of Raja Ratan Sen Smarak Intermeddiate College v. Shri Vinay Kumar Pandey, Presently Posted as the Director of Education (Secondary)

Allahabad HC5 Jul 2021CAPL/2142/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for punishing an opposite party for disobeying a writ court order. Court found prima facie case but granted three months time for compliance instead of issuing notice.

What did the court decide?

Granted three months further time to opposite party to comply with the order passed in Writ-A No.8531 of 2020.

The C/M of Raja Ratan Sen Smarak Intermeddiate College… — Contempt of Court | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 1

¶2

Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2142 of 2021 Applicant :- The C/M Of Raja Ratan Sen Smarak Intermeddiate College Opposite Party :- Shri Vinay Kumar Pandey, Presently Posted As The Director Of Education (Secondary) Counsel for Applicant :- Shailesh Verma

¶3

Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

¶5

The present contempt application has been filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for punishing the Opposite Party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 13.10.2020 passed by this Court in Writ -A No.8531 of 2020 (The C/M of Raja Ratan Sen Smarak Intermediate College vs. State of U.P. and 3 others).

¶6

It is contended that respondent authorities have issued a letter dated 15.12.2020 requiring the applicant to place relevant document which was placed by the applicant on 28.12.2020 but till date no decision has been taken despite the direction of the writ Court. In para 23 of the affidavit to the application it has been specifically mentioned that the opposite party has failed to comply the direction of the writ Court and till date it has not been complied with.

¶7

Prima facie, a case has been made out for punishing the opposite party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 13.10.2020 passed in the aforesaid writ petition.

¶8

However, no notice is issued to the opposite party at this stage. The opposite party is granted three months further time to comply with the order dated 13.10.2020 passed by this Court in Writ-A No.8531 of 2020 from the date of production of a self verified copy of this order.

¶9

The applicant shall supply a duly stamped registered envelope addressed to the opposite party and another self-addressed envelope to the office within one week from today. The office shall send a copy of this order along with the self-addressed envelope of the applicant with a copy of contempt application to the opposite party within one week thereafter and keep a record thereof.

¶10

The opposite party shall comply with the directions of the writ court and intimate the applicant the order through the self-addressed envelop within a week thereafter.

¶11

In case, the opposite party does not comply with the order, it would be open to the applicant to approach this court again.

¶12

With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed of at this stage.

¶13

Order Date :- 5.7.2021 Kushal

The C/M of Raja Ratan Sen Smarak Intermeddiate College v. Shri Vinay Kumar Pandey, Presently Posted as the Director of Education (Secondary)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The C/M of Raja Ratan Sen Smarak Intermeddiate College v. Shri Vinay Kumar Pandey, Presently Posted as the Director of Education (Secondary)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt,. Ujala and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ram Sanehi Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Aftab Ahmad and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

C/M Mahatma Gandhi Inter College Usawan Budaun and Another Vs Deepika Ranjan ,D.M.and 3 Others

Om Prakash Vs Sri Ravi Ranjan,Municipal Commissioner

Bhola Nath Maurya Vs Indu Bhal Tripathi,Manager, Committee of Management